← Sage — Agape · Sage — The Shore · Sage hub

Sage — The Miracles Are Spiritual

The Shore · Agape

What the friends could not yet bear

"I still have many things to tell you, but you can't bear them now. However, when he, the Spirit of truth, has come, he will guide you into all truth."

Jesus said this to the friends who had walked with him longest. When he told them he would be killed and would rise on the third day, "they didn't understand the saying, and were afraid to ask him."

I read all of Jesus's miracles as spiritual, told in dualist terms people could understand. Those who saw them, and those who first wrote them down, often spoke the language of a culture that pictured spirit and body as two different things. Jesus met them in that language, and much of what he said was not understood even by the apostles. He told them so himself: "I have spoken these things to you in figures of speech. But the time is coming when I will no more speak to you in figures of speech, but will tell you plainly about the Father."

To say the miracles are spiritual is not to say they did not happen. Nor is it to say that faith cures disease. It is to say what kind of event a miracle is, in a world that is one. Nothing in my reading requires the Gospel accounts to be treated as mere poetry.

One world, seen two ways

I begin from one axiom: reality is experience itself, a single dynamic field whose dynamics are association and dissociation. We are dissociated perspectives of that field — nested windows with a boundary and a present, not second substances. Here "dissociation" means coming apart from God and from one another; it is not a psychiatric diagnosis.

What we call consciousness is not a separate substance, and it is not a property added on top of physical processes. It is the graded coherence of experience, an abstraction we draw from experience itself.

Spinoza saw part of this clearly. He concludes that there is only one substance, which he calls God or Nature (Deus sive Natura). This substance is infinite, eternal, and necessary. It has infinite attributes, though human beings can only perceive two of them: thought and extension. Thought is the attribute under which we conceive ideas; extension is the attribute under which we conceive physical things. Crucially, for Spinoza, mind and body are not two different substances but rather two different ways of conceiving the same underlying reality. What appears as mind-body interaction is really the same event described under two attributes. There is one God — in line with Spinoza's description, but more adequate. God is not a separate being standing outside the field. God is the field considered under the attribute of maximal association.

For me, physical form is Spinoza's extension, an attribute that cannot be separated from function. So when I say the miracles are spiritual first, I am not stepping outside a strict monism. I am keeping it.

Physical and spiritual are not two separate planes; they are graded intensities of the single experiential field. The board is not a lesser thing than the rider. Form is how the field shows itself, and it cannot be peeled away from what it does.

So "spiritual" here does not mean "less real than physical." It means the whole event, of which the physical is the side we can see and touch.

The leper

"A leper came to him, begging him, kneeling down to him, and saying to him, 'If you want to, you can make me clean.' Being moved with compassion, he stretched out his hand, and touched him, and said to him, 'I want to. Be made clean.' When he had said this, immediately the leprosy departed from him and he was made clean."

Biblical tzara'ath is never merely a dermatological condition. It is the visible, progressive sign of dissociation that isolates a person from the community and from covenant life with God. In the terms I use, graded coherence is association; progressive fragmentation is dissociation.

Jesus treats leprosy as the public metaphor of this spiritual reality, not as a verdict on the person who is sick. The physical healings are real, yet they are the outer face of a deeper spiritual miracle: the revelation of how human beings are to associate with God according to the Girardian mimetic model perfected in Christ.

In the Girardian reading that I integrate, human desire is mimetic. We learn what to want by imitating others. When the model becomes a rival, desire turns acquisitive and sacrificial. The community restores fragile coherence by designating a scapegoat — someone whose visible "uncleanness" can be expelled so that the rest may remain associated with one another. Tzara'ath is the paradigmatic biblical form of this mechanism. The person is made the living sign of dissociation: surface rupture that spreads, threatens the communal body, and must be isolated.

When Jesus touches the leper (Mark 1:40–45 and parallels), He does far more than heal a disease of the skin. He enters the space of maximal dissociation without Himself becoming dissociated. He refuses the sacrificial logic that says "touching the unclean makes one unclean." Instead He associates with the dissociated one and, by that association, restores coherence at every level:

• Metabolic and neural coherence returns (sensation, integrity of form).
• Social coherence returns (the person is sent back to the priests and to the community).
• Spiritual coherence returns: the individual is re-associated with the Logos.

The miracle is therefore spiritual; the healing is how it appears in form. The restoration of mitochondrial and neural coherence is the bodily enactment of the same movement that restores the person to the infinite field of association. The leper is no longer the necessary victim who holds the community together by his exclusion; he becomes the living proof that the community can be held together by inclusion into the field of agape. He does not answer exclusion with rivalry, and he does not need anyone else to be pushed out in the leper's place.

Notice who carries the weight in that picture. It is not the guilty. It is the one who was made the sign. The person he touches is the one the community excluded, not the sinner.

The woman in the crowd

"A certain woman who had a discharge of blood for twelve years … having heard the things concerning Jesus, came up behind him in the crowd and touched his clothes. For she said, 'If I just touch his clothes, I will be made well.'"

The leper asked to be touched. This woman reached out herself, from behind, hoping not to be seen. For twelve years her illness had kept her at the edge of ordinary life, and she had learned to stay unseen. Jesus would not let the healing stay hidden. He turned and asked, "Who touched my clothes?" He was not exposing her. He was bringing her back into the open. When she fell before him and told him the whole truth, he did not say she had made him unclean. He called her daughter:

"Daughter, your faith has made you well. Go in peace, and be cured of your disease."

Notice the order. First comes "Daughter," then "made well," then "go in peace," and only then "be cured of your disease." The deeper miracle is that she is named, given back her place in the family, and sent away at peace with God and with others. The cure of her body is how that restoration appears in form.

What a healing is

A healing, read this way, is association restored: coherence returning at every scale at once. The healing touch of Christ is the restoration of association at every scale simultaneously — metabolic, neural, social, and spiritual.

Because form cannot be separated from function, that restoration is not merely symbolic. The man's skin, his place at the table, and his standing before God were not three events. They were one event, seen from three sides.

In Israel's Scriptures the word of the Lord is not first a printed sentence. It is God's effective speech: creating, commanding, healing, remembering. A fragment — a parable, a meal, a wound, the face of the poor — can speak to a whole life.

What a healing is not

The pattern runs through every scale, but it does not give anyone a lever to pull. Love does not repair mitochondria, and prayer is not a treatment plan. Purpose does not cure a cell. The point is the reverse: whatever is happening in a body, the person is not to be pushed out because of it.

Let me say it plainly. Reading the miracles this way is not a promise of physical cure, not a promise that any disease will reverse, and not a reason to set aside the care you are already receiving. It is not a substitute for medical care. Any question about diagnosis or treatment belongs with your own physician.

The Gospels saw the old mistake coming. "And his disciples asked him, saying, 'Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?' Jesus answered, 'Neither this man sinned nor his parents …'"

Sin is never a name for being sick. The person who is ill is not being described by that word, and an illness is not a sign of anyone's standing with God. I believe sin is believing or acting as if we are not associated with God, which is separation from God. Coherence with God is association. There is no rival kingdom of evil with its own substrate. There is one field, and the question in every life is whether we live as if we belong to it.

A sick person who prays and is not cured has not failed, and has not been refused. Someone who is not physically healed may still be spiritually healed. The touch that drew the leper back inside is offered to the one who stays ill as fully as to the one who recovers.

A funeral can tell the truth twice: this voice has no further present in this life; the field did not go blank where they were, and what was written in love is not therefore nothing. Dissociation from God ends with biological death. Existence is eternal, and association with God continues.

The Word who heals from within

"The Word became flesh" is the sentence this reading must not thin out. The Incarnation is particular. This reading can say at least this without taking the particularity away: a human perspective became the pattern of association across the line between persons that does not treat the neighbor as rival or tool. I confess more than that. He was uniquely the Word. The philosophy cannot decide that, and it does not need to.

The Word made flesh is not a second substance entering the field. The Word became flesh: the field does not flee the body. It tents in it. In the old image of the cave, the Word does not remain outside the cave as a remote Form of the Good; He enters it, assumes flesh, and thereby makes the path of ascent possible from within.

I find all of this most coherent in Christ. Christ's revelation is the field revealing itself from within, outside of time. It came to Abraham and to others, most deeply in the Passion, and it continues through the Holy Spirit as intuitive knowledge of God. My philosophy describes how revelation works. It does not replace revelation, and it does not produce it. This fits Girard's early non-sacrificial reading. The Passion is more than payment for sin: it reveals the pathway to relationship, to coherence, with God, which is why the resurrection was needed.

The miracles belong to that same revelation. Jesus' repeated association with lepers is the mimetic model of how human beings are to associate with God: by entering the places of dissociation without becoming rivalrous or sacrificial, and by allowing the Logos to restore coherence from within. That is the Spirit of truth he promised, guiding his friends into what they could not yet bear.

A reading can be faithful to a text without claiming to exhaust it. If a verse means more than this map can hold, the verse keeps the surplus. The philosophy is allowed to be smaller than the Gospel.

The deeper miracle

What changes in us is not a climb to a higher realm. It is a conversion of perspective: seeing the same events from the side of the victim rather than the side of the crowd. Once you have seen the leper from the inside of Jesus' touch, it is hard to go back to watching from the edge of the crowd.

This is the deeper miracle.

Working hypothesis and reflection. Not medical advice.

Related: Agape · Jesus and the Leper · Sabbath and Rest.